Blaming your ex: a quick budget analogy

When people complain about the national debt accumulated during Barack Obama's first term, it's worth remembering that nearly all of our current annual deficit (the gap between the amount of income we raise through taxes and fees and what we spend on goods, services, and interest payments), and therefore the growth of the debt, is the result of:

1- policies initiated by George W. Bush:

2001 and 2003 tax cuts
2003 prescription drug benefit for seniors
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
very deserved health, education, and retirement benefits that troops will rightfully receive long after those wars have concluded
Wall Street bailout and government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

none of which were "paid for" through tax increases or spending cuts;* and

2- the Great Recession:

millions of people who don't need food stamps, unemployment benefits, or Medicaid when the economy is good, do need them when the economy goes south, making those programs automatically (but temporarily) a lot more expensive
tax receipts plummet because while unemployed people pay taxes, they don’t pay nearly as much in taxes as employed people do, and unprofitable corporations pay even less.

(Read more from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.)

Of course, if you point this out, you'll get shouted down that it's time to stop blaming Bush.

I've been trying for awhile now to think of a good real-world analogy to explain what's going on in the budget and I may have finally come up with one:

It's like your reckless spouse bought a sports car. He's long gone but you're still stuck making the payments. Every single month, another big chunk of money goes out the door for a decision he made. No wonder you want to slug your neighbor when she tells you to stop blaming your ex.

*For what it's worth, I don't disagree with all of those policies. I just disagree with not paying for them.

Comments

When a known liar is accused of attempted rape, should he serve on the Supreme Court?

Kavanaugh categorically denies the allegations. His conservative backers think he probably did it anyway. They just don't care. Or care that he could be lying about it now. On Sunday, the Washington Post reported that California psychology professor Dr. Christine Blasey Ford had credibly accused Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault and attempted rape when they were both in high school. As reported in the Post, significant circumstantial evidence supports Dr. Blasey Ford, who described the attack to therapists in 2012 and 2013, long before Kavanaugh’s nomination, and who passed a lie detector test in August. The Senate Judiciary Committee had been scheduled to vote on the nomination today, with a vote in the full Senate planned for next week. At first, Republicans attempted to muscle their way through. When that became untenable, they hastily announced a hearing for this coming Monday, September 24, allowing little time to investigate

Yesterday we saw the Brett Kavanaugh that his victims saw

tl,dr; Yesterday was a lot. An angry, spittle-flecked, partisan hack cried, screamed, pouted, spouted conspiracy theories, and most importantly lied under oath, looking every bit like the aggressive mean drunk that his victims told us he was. And Republican men apologized to him—to him!—without saying a single word to the woman he attacked, even as she earnestly, painfully relived one of the worst moments of her life. My write-up: After a harrowing hearing on Thursday, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee look set to advance the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh. The vote could come less than 24 hours after Dr. Christine Blasey Ford testified under oath that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her when they were both teenagers. Even though two more women—Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick—have accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault on the record and have called for an FBI investigation into their allegations, only Dr. Blasey Ford was allowed to testify. Afraid of

Personal Observations on Brett Kavanaugh and Misogyny

—September 26, 2018 — Reliving my own stories of disempowerment and hearing those of so many other women, I wanted to relay a story about one time with a happier ending. When I was a freshman in college, I lived in a dorm with a handful of girls I’m still friends with today. At some point early in the year, the boys who lived on the first floor right by the entrance put up a soft-core porn poster on the outside of their door depicting a college-age girl in a demeaning pose. Every girl who entered the dorm had to walk by that poster just to get to her own bedroom. It was degrading, threatening, disgusting. It communicated: we can do whatever we want and you just have to put up with it. I don’t remember who had the idea but I remember that I was the one who found the replacement poster: a male stripper in a provocative pose completely naked but for a well-placed cowboy hat covering his genitalia. Early one morning, my partner in crime and I crept down to the first floor an

A Mile Wide, An Inch Deep

Search This Blog