Skip to main content
Image
By

A Mile Wide...

Working for the U.S. House of Representatives for much of my adult life, I liked to say that being a congressional staffer made me great at cocktail parties: thanks to the nature of the job, I have a knowledge base that’s a mile wide but only an inch deep.  This blog is my opportunity to write about those areas of focus where I have been able to dive deeper.  It is, theoretically, a chance to spend less time terrorizing friends on Facebook in disposable policy debates that get lost among Dexter discussions and kid photos (I’m a fan of both) and to spend more time putting my thoughts into one nice, coherent, semi-permanent place.  But I suspect it's probably more about the latter than the former: I envision a repository that grows with me as I learn and think about new things, or think about old things in new ways--one that allows me to keep all of those thoughts together so that I'm not reinventing the wheel every time I write a new memo or want to track down a helpful data set.

For those subjects where I claim a modest degree of expertise, I’ve often ended up with my own framework for thinking about them and with my own analogies for explaining them to a broader public audience.  (One of the more fun challenges of working in public policy is to write the ‘talking points’ that make complex policy questions relatable.  I stay up nights trying to think of the perfect analogy to explain the healthcare law’s individual mandate or the difference between mandatory and discretionary spending.)  To the extent that those frameworks and analogies might be interesting or helpful to others, they’re here, publicly available instead of locked away on my hard drive.  And to the extent that making them public provides people with an opportunity to tell me why I’m wrong, that’s helpful too.  I respect any opinion that can be backed up.  (Less so the opinions that end with ‘You might have all the facts, but I still think…’)

Of course, in keeping with the name of the blog, I’m not sure I’ll be able to limit myself to just those areas where I claim to know what I’m talking about.  I stayed on the Hill for a long time because it’s the only job where one is paid to have an opinion about everything.  And I do.  Have an opinion. About everything. Some of that is bound to spill over here.  

And lastly, of course, I know a number of interesting people and I’d like to hear more from them.  Starting this blog and keeping it as wide as possible gives me access to insights I haven’t heard before.  

 I've been delaying starting this for a long while because I've let the perfect be the enemy of the good. I've decided to proceed now even though I know I'll want to come back and refine, refine, refine until I get to some kind of 'definitive truth' about the federal budget or tax policy or healthcare or gun control or abortion or poverty or economic mobility or the social contract... That's where people (civilly) telling me I'm wrong is helpful. If someone gives me new facts or insights, I want to be able to assimilate them, Borg-like, into my worldview until I'm moving closer and closer to truth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GOP Ready to "Plow Through" Kavanaugh Nom, Women Ready to Testify About Sexual Assault Allegations Under Oath

By
Julie Swetnick A third woman, Julie Swetnick, has come forward alleging sexual assault by Brett Kavanaugh and his best friend in high school, Mark Judge. ( Link to the affidavit . Allegations are disturbing so warning in advance.) Mark Judge—now a conservative writer with a long history of making misogynistic, homophobic, and transphobic statements—is also a witness and accomplice to the attempted rape alleged by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Swetnick has stated her allegations in an affidavit under oath and is calling for an FBI investigation. Her  allegations align with  those made by Ford, Deborah Ramirez, and  Mark Judge's high school girlfriend . Two quick asides: 1- Swetnick is represented by Michael Avenatti, Stormy Daniels lawyer, and Republicans are trying to make him the story , instead of responding to what Swetnick has said under oath. 2- After  Ramirez came forward in the New Yorker , the New York Times ran an absolute shit hit piece on Ramirez...
Post a Comment
Read more

When a known liar is accused of attempted rape, should he serve on the Supreme Court?

By
Kavanaugh categorically denies the allegations. His conservative backers think he probably did it anyway. They just don't care. Or care that he could be lying about it now. On Sunday, the Washington Post reported that California psychology professor Dr. Christine Blasey Ford had credibly accused Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault and attempted rape when they were both in high school. As reported in the Post, significant circumstantial evidence supports Dr. Blasey Ford, who described the attack to therapists in 2012 and 2013, long before Kavanaugh’s nomination, and who passed a lie detector test in August. The Senate Judiciary Committee had been scheduled to vote on the nomination today, with a vote in the full Senate planned for next week. At first, Republicans attempted to muscle their way through. When that became untenable, they hastily announced a hearing for this coming Monday, September 24, allowing little time to investigate...
Post a Comment
Read more

Omnibus and ACA Market Stabilization

By
Omnibus, Poison Pills, and a Third Government Shutdown? This week, Congress is negotiating the last pieces of an omnibus spending package to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year. Current stopgap funding expires on March 23. Originally slated for a House vote this week, the timeline has been pushed to early next week. While most of the spending decisions have been finalized, big questions remain over more than a hundred controversial policy changes that Republicans hope to tie the bill. The package is likely one of the last big, must-pass bills Congress will take up before the election, making it the last chance for members of Congress to win legislative victories that they can take home. Anti-abortion conservatives, in particular, are clamoring for a win now that Republicans have given up on attempting a third reconciliation package, which would have let them once again try to force through attacks on Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers with just 50 s...
Post a Comment
Read more