Skip to main content

"Require a strategic ability that GOP leaders, particularly in the House, have yet to prove they have..."

Image
By
Democratic control of Congress, 2007-2010 (two years with Pres. Bush and two with Pres. Obama), was among the most productive in US history. As a staffer, it left me exhausted but with a tremendous feeling of accomplishment, like when a burst of energy lets you get through a 5-page list of household to-do items you've been putting off for months.

In contrast, the last four years of Republican control of the House, 2011-2014, have been like those days where you can't even buy bread -- just about the most basic act of adulthood -- without drama because your 4-year-old has taken off his shoes and is lying in the aisle screaming for candy.

Every single act of governing has been a struggle and a crisis, no matter how elemental or routine. I'm left feeling exhausted, but with nothing accomplished, because I've been forced to use up all of my energy just passing a straight funding bill, the household equivalent of putting on socks.

Will next Congress under a united Republican House and Senate be any better? For months I've been saying "Not a chance!" to anyone who will listen, and here comes Congressional Quarterly to back me up:

Successfully advancing their agenda will require a strategic ability that GOP leaders, particularly in the House, have yet to prove they have. And any missteps could doom their 2016 White House prospects. ...  Most Senate Republicans know that hard-line conservatives’ demands are unrealistic, but previously they’ve been able to blame Reid. If Republicans have the majority, that’s no longer an option.


Though it's been fun for Republicans to blame Harry Reid and Pres. Obama, the biggest struggles have not been Democrat v. Republican, but rather Republican v. Republican. I've watched in amusement/disgust/horror/now resignation as House Republicans couldn't even pass a transportation spending bill at their preferred level -- again, an act so simple it's like putting on socks.

Now they're going to try to write a budget that cuts even deeper than that level? No way. The next two years are not going to be a Republican fire quenched only by Pres. Obama. They are going to be a non-stop civil war. And two years from now? Democrats will once again control the Senate and the White House while Republicans retain the House... and we'll be right back where we are now.

I feel tired just writing about it.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Two Religions Tell Us About the Modern Dating Crisis - TIME

By
This article is so interesting to me, and seems to touch on so many different aspects of our current culture, both secular and non. I have no objection to cosmetic surgery. I've had both lasik eye surgery and liposuction over the years -- the former an equal measure of laziness and vanity, the latter pure vanity. I'd hated that little spare tire since I was 6 years old and so one day I had it delightfully sucked right out of me! But the stories over the years about the enormous amount of plastic surgery -- particularly breast augmentations -- performed in Utah have been eye-catching (not the least of which because the Church frowns so heavily on other much-less-invasive violations of the body-is-a-temple principle, like tattoos and multiple ear-piercings in an earlobe). When we were still friends, the husband of my old roommate continually pushed her to get a 'boob job' because everyone else in their ward had gotten one and he wanted her to have bigger breasts....
Post a Comment
Read more

John McCain: 2009 ACA debate "one of most hard-fought and fair" in my time

By
Was the ACA rammed through Congress with no Republican opportunity to amend the bill? Nope. But don't take my word for it. Here is Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) on the Senate floor, September 24, 2013. He notes that 160 Republican amendments were accepted in the HELP committee alone. He says the ACA fight was "one of the most hard-fought and fair, in my view, debates that has taken place on the floor of the Senate in the time I have been here." He says he's "proud of the effort we made and, frankly, the other side of the aisle allowed that debate to take place." Mr. McCAIN. It is a matter of record that the Senate Finance Committee considered the Affordable Care Act over several weeks and approved the bill on October 13, 2009. At that time members of the Finance Committee submitted 564 amendments, 135 amendments were considered, 79 rollcall votes were taken, and 41 amendments were adopted. Then the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Saving the ACA — installment #2

By
If you've ended up here from installment #1 , you already know that congressional Republicans plan to use a parliamentary tool known as 'budget reconciliation' to partially repeal the ACA. And you know that if Republicans are able to pass a reconciliation-based repeal this winter/spring, they'll create a big chaotic mess in the health insurance markets just in time for the 2018 mid-terms. (Click here for a checklist of where Republicans are in the process and an overview of what they're planning for the next two years.) But that's only part of the story. What do the politics look like for Republicans now that their rhetoric around repeal is suddenly being taken seriously? Republican Congressman Mike Coffman (CO) got a small taste when he was forced to sneak out of his own constituent meeting early. But Republicans have reason to worry about much more than just contentious constituent meetings because... There are big differences between what Republ...
Post a Comment
Read more